It is our contention that people are owed some of this before committing to Steiner Waldorf ed. It may be that such things are just what you are looking for: the informed decision remains yours to make.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Click the links to find out more information about any topic. |
Particular thanks are due to the contributor of this page who, for entirely valid reasons of their own wish to remain anonymous. -----------------------oOo--------------------------- There are a variety of viewpoints concerning the relationship of Anthroposophy to Steiner/Waldorf education and as a parent it can be hard to work out just what is going on in this respect. The following thoughts are just my own understandings based on a Steiner training and a number of years experience as a parent in Steiner/Waldorf Schools. KARMA IN THE CLASSROOM This may seem an odd concept to many parents and yet it appears to be the foundation stone in a Steiner/Waldorf School. However, the word Karma tends not to be mentioned in a Steiner/Waldorf Prospectus. Karma as a fundamental aspect of Steiner/Waldorf education is, to my awareness, not given public attention in either the schools themselves or the promotional material on websites. There are references to "head, heart and hands", educating the whole child and the spiritual but not even a broad overview of this core belief. Given that this is a critical influence on the decisions made by the teacher about the children both as individuals and as a group, this strikes me as a serious omission. I have seen this lead to deeply distressing scenarios in schools, particularly (but not exclusively) where the parents themselves are not Anthroposophists. Parents can find themselves caught out, confused or indeed amazed by a teacher's apparent complacency about issues such as poor learning, innappropriate social behaviour and bullying. Teachers, whose role it appears, is to enable Karma rather than stifle it, seem to find it difficult working with Rudolf Steiner's views to make decisions about when, or indeed if, they should intervene. When these inevitable problems of school life occur they are sometimes not handled in the expected fashion or with practical constructiveness and accountability on the part of the teachers. It is not unusual for parents to feel that their concerns are viewed as invalid or an unwelcome interference and indeed they may well have been excluded from information and decisions made about their own child (In Child Studies for example). It is my view that this goes beyond being accidental or due to time factors and into the realm of a conscious sense by Steiner/Waldorf teachers that they have a superior understanding of the child which is not to be exposed to the scrutiny of parents. Unless parents have the right to know what is taking place with their child and the absolute ethos of the people teaching them they are disempowered and may find themselves unable to fulfil their responsibilities toward the well-being of their children. Not through any kind of neglect I must add but because without knowing what is being said or done with one's child, it is nearly impossible to make sense of the situation. There are many parents who feel that due to this "unspoken agenda" their children have suffered emotional and educational damage and that it has been a painful experience for the family. Anthroposophy seems to me to be primarily about the development of the human soul through successive incarnations. Rudolf Steiner described in his view of the human being an evolution of soul-consciousness through epochs spanning thousands of years. He devised the Waldorf Education curriculum to (among other things) reflect and follow this evolution. However, because he regarded the child as having come from the divine world, having established it's destiny in a pre-earthly decision making process based on experiences in previous incarnations, Rudolf Steiner also viewed the relationship between teacher and child as having special intent. He saw teachers as having both a superior understanding (through Waldorf pedagogy) and a key role as a guide to the child's soul/spirit development. It is therefore considered both the child's and the teacher's destiny to be together in the Waldorf classroom. Steiner determined that children needed to be educated in a certain way in order to be best able to fulfil their destiny and enable the soul development steps to be taken in each lifetime. He designed Waldorf Education for this express purpose and it continues to be the underlying belief system of Steiner/Waldorf Schools today. The aim of the following article is to make it unequivocally clear that Rudolf Steiner's concept of Karma is used by teachers . This applies whether the setting is a Steiner/Waldorf School, a Camphill School, or other Anthroposophical institution. It is my belief that parents have the right to make up their own minds whether or not they would like this to be the basis of their child's education. Child Development 1 Spiritual science explains how supersensible forces are at work in nature and in the cosmos. It provides an explanation of world evolution which satisfies the demands of science and religion. It gives knowledge of man, of his divine origin and of the essential being behind the exterior form. It deals with questions of existence before birth and after death, together with those of karma and destiny. It points to the individual's ages involvement with the whole of the rest of mankind and the universe and brings him to realise that his own acts have a cosmic, universal significance. It shows how supersensible forces work in the bodily organisation and how, particularly in childhood, they manifest at different times. It looks at life as a whole in the realisation that influences in youth have their effect throughout life, even to the extent that wrong educational practices lead to physical illnesses in later life. It analyses the temperaments of children and explains how to deal with them. It points to the effect of the teacher's temperament on his pupils. It relates the manner of teaching and choice of subjects to chronological age. In the light of human development it points to the tasks of education at the present time." |
||||||||||||||||||||